Radiological Protection of People and the Environment in the Event of a Large Nuclear Accident


Draft document: Radiological Protection of People and the Environment in the Event of a Large Nuclear Accident
Submitted by 木村雅英 KIMURA Masahide, none
Commenting as an individual

I would like to add a comment on ANNEX B.

 

About ANNEX B

(B42)There is a big mistake in.

*There is an unbelievable mistake in documents submitted by the Fukushima prefectural government's thyroid gland screening committee. But more importantly, "An analysis method, which is known to be less likely to make a difference, is adopted later.".
*The summary document of thyroid examinations in Fukushima Prefecture ignored such various problems with the reservation of "At this point in time" and, of course, it did not prove that there was no relationship with radiation exposure.
*The Review Committee and the Thyroid Examination and Evaluation Panel do not "prefectural health survey" "Exposure in Fukushima proved not to increase thyroid cancer" at all.

 

(in Japanese)

ANNEX Bについての追加意見

(B42)に大きな間違いがある。

○福島県の甲状腺検査評価部会で提出された資料には信じ難いミスがある。またそれ以上に問題なのは「差がでにくいとわかっている解析方法を後出しで採用した」こと。

○福島県の甲状腺検査のまとめの文書はそのような様々な問題点を無視したもので「現時点において」という留保がつけられており、被曝との関係がないことを証明したものではもちろん全くない。

○「県民健康調査」検討委員会および甲状腺検査評価部会の見解は、「福島では被曝によって甲状腺がんが増えないことが証明された」訳では全く無い。

 

 

(postscript)

Thank you for accepting my posting (Fri, 2019 Sep 13 12:02:41 + 0200)

at around 12 o'clock on Friday, September 13 and posting my opinion on the ICRP website.

 

However, the attached image in the text is not displayed.

When I submitted it, I attached a PDF with the text and images, butthe figurae didn't appear.

I will attach only the image in this email, so please add it after thenext sentence if possible.

 

 汚染図(東京新聞2018年12月22日報道)

Contamination map (Tokyo Shimbun, December 22, 2018)

 

I'm sorry to trouble you, but I appreciate your cooperation.

 

Thank you.

 


Back